• Graduate Programs
    • Tinbergen Institute Research Master in Economics
      • Why Tinbergen Institute?
      • Research Master
      • Admissions
      • Course Registration
      • Facilities
      • PhD Vacancies
      • Selected PhD Placements
    • Research Master Business Data Science
    • PhD Vacancies
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Gender in Society
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 16th Tinbergen Institute Annual Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Alumni
Home | Events Archive | Testing by Betting and Borrowing Revisited
Research Master Pre-Defense

Testing by Betting and Borrowing Revisited

  • Speaker(s)
    Yonis Kulane , Yonis Kulane
  • Location
    EUR
    Rotterdam
  • Date and time

    June 18, 2025
    11:00 - 12:30

We study the betting game introduced by Shafer & Vovk (2005) and used by Wang & Ramdas (2024) to study borrowing in a binary betting game. We first show how this betting game is equivalent to testing with log-optimal e-values where the alternative distribution is implied by the betting strategy. The amount of wealth gambled is directly linked to the implied alternative. We use this insight to generalize betting games with borrowing to non-binary settings. In addition, we assess the statistical impact of borrowing via Monte Carlo simulations. The results of our simulations illustrate that the best performing borrowing strategy is one where long-term liabilities are zero. Borrowing does not lead to long-term effects but might increase evidence in the short run. Finally, we argue that net wealth is a more suitable measure of evidence against a null hypothesis. We also discuss the implications of restricting net wealth to be nonnegative and borrowing on evidence.