• Graduate program
  • Research
  • News
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Climate Change
      • Gender in Society
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
      • Receive updates
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • Conference: Consumer Search and Markets
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • Summer School
    • Climate Change
    • Gender in Society
    • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
    • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Receive updates
  • Alumni
  • Magazine
Home | Events Archive | Opening up Military Innovation: An Evaluation of Reforms to the U.S. Air Force SBIR Program
Seminar

Opening up Military Innovation: An Evaluation of Reforms to the U.S. Air Force SBIR Program


  • Series
  • Speaker(s)
    John van Reenen (London School of Economics, United Kingdom)
  • Field
    Empirical Microeconomics
  • Location
    Online
  • Date and time

    March 22, 2021
    12:00 - 13:00

When investing in research and development (R&D), institutions must decide whether to take a top-down approach – soliciting a particular technology – or a bottom-up approach in which innovators suggest ideas. This paper examines a reform to the U.S. Air Force Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program that transitioned from “Conventional topics,” which solicit highly specific technologies in a top-down approach, to “Open topics,” which invite firms to suggest any new technology that may be useful to the Air Force. We document that the U.S. defense industrial base has become less innovative and more concentrated in recent decades, and the Open program seeks to address these kind of challenges . We show that the Open program attracts new entrants (e.g. younger firms and those without previous defense SBIR awards). In a regression discontinuity design that offers the first causal evaluation of a defense R&D program, we show that winning an Open award increases future venture capital investment, non-SBIR defense contracting (an indicator of successful technology development), and patenting. Conventional awards have no effects on these outcomes but do increase the chances of future defense SBIR contracts, fostering incumbency. We find that Open's success is partly due to attracting firms with larger treatment effects (e.g. new entrants) and partly to the bottom up nature of the program itself (exploiting machine-learning text analysis of SBIR application). Our results suggest that government (and perhaps private sector) innovation could benefit from more bottom-up, decentralized approaches that reduce barriers to entry, minimize lock-in advantages for incumbents, and attract a wider range of new entrants.

• Please register for the seminar here. You will then receive the details of the zoom session by email.

• Please keep your microphone on mute, except when asking a question.

• Asking questions: please just go ahead and ask questions in the “usual way” (ie, don’t use the chat for this; but please do use it to notify the host of any problem related to seminar).

• Please use the registration form also to register for a Zoom bilateral. John agreed to 3 meetings of 20 min only so the ones who register first will get space.