• Graduate Programs
    • Tinbergen Institute Research Master in Economics
      • Why Tinbergen Institute?
      • Research Master
      • Admissions
      • All Placement Records
      • PhD Vacancies
    • Facilities
    • Research Master Business Data Science
    • Education for external participants
    • Summer School
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • PhD Vacancies
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Summer School
  • Alumni
    • PhD Theses
    • Master Theses
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Key alumni publications
    • Alumni Community
Home | Events Archive | Perceived Inequality, Reference Groups and Preferences for Redistribution Among High Earners
Seminar

Perceived Inequality, Reference Groups and Preferences for Redistribution Among High Earners


  • Location
    Online
  • Date and time

    February 17, 2022
    12:00 - 13:00

Abstract: We investigate attitudes towards inequality among the “working rich” using a unique sample of nearly 1,000 graduates from a highly ranked MBA program and a representative sample of Americans. Our survey experiment shows that (1) high-earning individuals are far more likely to know their rank in the income distribution and that (2) comparisons with peers or others (i.e. reference groups) shape their redistributive preferences. This reference group treatment leads to an 18% drop in the income share allocated to the richest 1% but has no discernible effect on taxation preferences. We discuss the comparative and normative functions of reference groups as potential mechanisms.