• Graduate Programs
    • Tinbergen Institute Research Master in Economics
      • Why Tinbergen Institute?
      • Research Master
      • Admissions
      • All Placement Records
      • PhD Vacancies
    • Facilities
    • Research Master Business Data Science
    • Education for external participants
    • Summer School
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • PhD Vacancies
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Summer School
  • Alumni
    • PhD Theses
    • Master Theses
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Key alumni publications
    • Alumni Community
Home | Events Archive | Valuing non-marginal changes in mortality and morbidity risk
Seminar

Valuing non-marginal changes in mortality and morbidity risk


  • Series
    Health Economics Seminars
  • Speaker(s)
    Daniel Herrera (Paris Dauphine University, France)
  • Field
    Empirical Microeconomics
  • Location
    Polak 2-16
    Rotterdam
  • Date and time

    April 26, 2022
    12:00 - 13:00

Abstract: Many stated-preference studies that estimate the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for reductions in mortality or morbidity risk suffer from inadequate scope sensitivity. One possible reason is that the risk reductions typically presented to respondents are too small to be meaningful. Survey responses may thus not accurately reflect respondents' preferences for health and safety. In this paper we propose a novel way of estimating the value per statistical life (VSL) or the value per statistical case (VSC) based on risk reductions measurable as percentages. While such non-marginal risk reductions are easier to understand, they introduce well known feedback effects. We develop a methodology to de-bias VSL and VSC estimates derived from the evaluation of non-marginal risk reductions and prove the concept using simulated data.

This event will take place in hybrid form. Join the zoom session here:

https://eur-nl.zoom.us/j/91411440756