• Graduate program
    • Why Tinbergen Institute?
    • Program Structure
    • Courses
    • Course Registration
    • Facilities
    • Admissions
    • Recent PhD Placements
  • Research
  • News
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Behavioral Macro and Complexity
      • Econometrics and Data Science Methods for Business and Economics and Finance
      • Experimenting with Communication – A Hands-on Summer School
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Introduction in Genome-Wide Data Analysis
      • Research on Productivity, Trade, and Growth
      • Summer School Business Data Science Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
    • Events Archive
  • Summer School
  • Alumni
  • Times
Home | Events Archive | Long-term Effects of Graduating in a Recession for Low and High Educated

Long-term Effects of Graduating in a Recession for Low and High Educated

  • Location
    Erasmus University Rotterdam, Campus Woudestein, Mandeville T3-14
  • Date and time

    May 04, 2022
    12:00 - 13:00

Economic conditions at time of labor market entry have been shown to have large negative effects on labor market outcomes for an extended period of time. These effects for the average labor market entrant may mask substantial heterogeneity across groups, as some may be better able to accommodate adverse conditions upon labor market entry than others. This paper estimates the long-term effects of economic conditions at labor market entry on income and employment for high and low educated separately up to 40 years after graduation. We use regional variation in the unemployment rate and proxy for time and location of labor market entry using birth region and nominal duration of education. For both high and low educated labor market entrants between 1971 and 1988, we find short-lived negative effects immediately after graduation. These negative effects on earnings and employment remain for high educated in the long run, but not for low educated. We hypothesize that adaption to adverse shocks is different for both groups.