• Graduate Programs
    • Facilities
    • Tinbergen Institute Research Master in Economics
      • Why Tinbergen Institute?
      • Research Master
      • Admissions
      • PhD Vacancies
      • Selected PhD Placements
    • Research Master Business Data Science
    • Education for external participants
    • Summer School
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • PhD Vacancies
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Summer School
  • Alumni
    • PhD Theses
    • Master Theses
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Key alumni publications
    • Alumni Community
Home | Events Archive | Optimal Stabilization Policy Responses to Necessity Supply Shocks
Seminar

Optimal Stabilization Policy Responses to Necessity Supply Shocks


  • Series
  • Speaker(s)
    Jonas Loebbing (Ludwig Maximilian University, Germany)
  • Field
    Macroeconomics
  • Location
    Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam, room 1.01
    Amsterdam
  • Date and time

    November 10, 2022
    16:00 - 17:15

Abstract
I study the effects of supply shocks in a two-sector business cycle model with nominal rigidities and (intratemporally) non-homothetic preferences. A negative shock to the supply of the necessity good -- i.e., the good with expenditure elasticity smaller than one (think: energy, food) -- creates excess demand and inflation in the necessity sector. A contractionary response of monetary policy reduces aggregate demand, but luxury demand is more sensitive to aggregate demand than is the demand for necessities. Thus, the contractionary policy primarily creates a demand shortage and unemployment in the luxury sector instead of reducing excess demand and inflation in the necessity sector. Lowering inflation becomes more costly in terms of unemployment and the optimal policy in response to an inflationary shock must accept a higher rate of inflation than in a benchmark case with homothetic preferences. These conclusions are reversed for shocks to the supply of luxuries. I briefly discuss the scope for more targeted interventions, by means of fiscal policy and others.