Home | Events Archive | SEMINAR HAS BEEN CANCELLED
Seminar

SEMINAR HAS BEEN CANCELLED


  • Series
    Micro Seminars
  • Speaker(s)
    Emilia Del Bono (University of Essex, United Kingdom)
  • Field
    Empirical Microeconomics
  • Location
    Erasmus University Rotterdam
    Rotterdam
  • Date

    May 17, 2024

Boosting Attendance through Goal Setting: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment

Abstract

Student effort is a key input in the production function of academic achievement. In tertiary education, this is mainly captured by attendance to lectures and classes, which is however generally low especially in the post-pandemic era and for some groups of students. There have been several attempts at increasing attendance among university students, most of them unsuccessful. Here we focus on a goal-setting intervention, implemented via a randomized controlled trial on a population of university students at a UK public university. Treated students set an attendance goal and receive weekly text reminders containing information about their progress towards that goal, they are also given the option to enter a commitment contract which unlocks a financial reward once the goal is achieved. We find that the intervention had a positive and statistically significant effect on attendance to lectures. Treated students recorded a 4.2% increase in participation over the remaining 6 weeks of the semester after the experiment was completed. This corresponded roughly to one more lecture attended over the whole term. Students that opted for a commitment contract showed the largest improvement in attendance (10%). We find no impact of the treatment on student GPA at the end of the term or on other academic performance indicators. We also investigate the mechanisms through which goal setting might work. Some theoretical models suggest that goals act as an internal commitment device for present biased and loss averse individuals. We use survey and laboratory measures of these individual traits to investigate heterogeneity in treatment effects and find that the impact of the intervention was larger for students with low levels of planning efficacy and who exhibited some degree of loss aversion.