• Graduate Programs
    • Tinbergen Institute Research Master in Economics
      • Why Tinbergen Institute?
      • Research Master
      • Admissions
      • All Placement Records
      • PhD Vacancies
    • Facilities
    • Research Master Business Data Science
    • Education for external participants
    • Summer School
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • PhD Vacancies
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Summer School
  • Alumni
    • PhD Theses
    • Master Theses
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Key alumni publications
    • Alumni Community
Home | Events Archive | Predicting re-employment: machine learning versus assessments by unemployed workers and by their caseworkers
Seminar

Predicting re-employment: machine learning versus assessments by unemployed workers and by their caseworkers


  • Series
  • Speaker
    Gerard van den Berg (University of Groningen)
  • Field
    Empirical Microeconomics
  • Location
    Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam, room 1.01
    Amsterdam
  • Date and time

    November 05, 2024
    15:30 - 16:30

Abstract

We analyze three sources of information on the individual probability of re-employment within 6 months (RE6), among individuals sampled from the inflow into unemployment. First, they are asked for their perceived probability of RE6 (sample N=1200). Second, their caseworkers reveal whether they expect RE6. Third, random-forest machine learning methods are trained on big administrative data on the full inflow, to predict individual RE6. We compare the predictive performance of these measures and consider the gains of combining them. Correcting the machine learning algorithm if the unemployed themselves predict long-term unemployment leads to a "super-predictor" with a superior performance. This gain is concentrated among risk averse unemployed who may have collected more information on future idiosyncratic events.