• Graduate Programs
    • Tinbergen Institute Research Master in Economics
      • Why Tinbergen Institute?
      • Research Master
      • Admissions
      • All Placement Records
      • PhD Vacancies
    • Facilities
    • Research Master Business Data Science
    • Education for external participants
    • Summer School
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • PhD Vacancies
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Summer School
  • Alumni
    • PhD Theses
    • Master Theses
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Key alumni publications
    • Alumni Community
Home | Events Archive | Medical Innovation and Health Inequality: Evidence from Direct-Acting Antivirals
Seminar

Medical Innovation and Health Inequality: Evidence from Direct-Acting Antivirals


  • Series
  • Speaker(s)
    Michael Darden (Johns Hopkins University, United States)
  • Field
    Empirical Microeconomics
  • Location
    Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam, room 1.01
    Amsterdam
  • Date and time

    March 11, 2025
    15:30 - 16:30

Abstract

We study the incidence of innovation-induced externalities by race. Following the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for Hepatitis C (HCV), we show that liver transplants increased for Black (11.9%), Hispanic (34.2%), and white (56.6%) HCV- end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients. However, these additional transplants went disproportionately to white patients. Only white HCV- ESLD patients saw a increase in the rate of transplantation (19.5 pp), in spite of the fact that marginal white registrants were of better liver health relative to marginal Black registrants. We conclude that most HCV- ESLD racial groups benefited from the externality generated by DAAs for HCV+ (with the clear exception of Asian patients) but that their introduction likely widened disparities in transplant outcomes between white and non-white patients. Joint paper with Kevin Callison and Keith Teltser.