• Graduate Programs
    • Tinbergen Institute Research Master in Economics
      • Why Tinbergen Institute?
      • Research Master
      • Admissions
      • Course Registration
      • PhD Vacancies
      • Selected PhD Placements
    • Facilities
    • Browse our Courses
    • Research Master Business Data Science
    • PhD Vacancies
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Gender in Society
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 16th Tinbergen Institute Annual Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Job Market Candidates
  • Alumni
    • PhD Theses
    • Master Theses
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Key alumni publications
    • Alumni Community
Home | Events | Price Drop Damages
Seminar

Price Drop Damages


  • Series
  • Speaker(s)
    Adriana Robertson (University of Chicago Law School, United States)
  • Field
    Finance, Accounting and Finance
  • Location
    University of Amsterdam, Campus Roeterseiland, A3.01 and online
    Amsterdam
  • Date and time

    November 18, 2025
    13:00 - 14:15

Abstract

When wrongdoing affects the value of an investment, the change in its price after the wrong has come to light is an appealing gauge of damages. But it is a biased gauge relative to intrinsic harm, because anticipation of the remedy itself informs price. We develop a model of price drop damages that allows one to characterize the extent as well as the direction of bias. We show that price drop damages overstate harm when the expected net award flowing to purchasers of the relevant security is positive, as in a corporate derivative case; but that they understate harm when the net recovery is negative, as in a securities fraud case. Our analysis thus identifies, and offers a means to weigh contextually, an overlooked downside to leveraging the wisdom of crowds. Joint paper with Vince Buccola.

Check all details for this seminar.