• Graduate Programs
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Summer School
    • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
    • Deep Learning
    • Development Economics
    • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
    • Economics of Climate Change
    • The Economics of Crime
    • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
    • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
    • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
    • Marketing Research with Purpose
    • Markets with Frictions
    • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Tuition Fees and Payment
  • Alumni
Home | Events Archive | Seminar has been cancelled
Seminar

Seminar has been cancelled


  • Series
  • Speaker(s)
    Antonio Penta (Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain)
  • Field
    Behavioral Economics
  • Location
    Tinbergen Institute, Campus Roeterseiland
    Amsterdam
  • Date and time

    April 30, 2026
    12:00 - 13:00


Title: What's in a u?

Abstract

We revisit the long-lasting debate about the meaning of the utility function used in Expected Utility (EU). Contrary to the common view that EU inherently links risk aversion to diminishing marginal utility, we demonstrate that these two concepts need not coincide. Marginal utility of money is an input into risk attitude, but it is not its sole determinant. An independent ‘pure risk’ attitude is also a contributing factor. We discuss some theoretical implications of this result for the following topics: non-neutral risk attitudes for profit maximizing firms; risk aversion over time lotteries in the presence of discounting, and convex time budget decisions; the equity premium puzzle. We also discuss matters of identification: for firms; via proxies; via MLE methods under parametric restrictions; in intertemporal choice problems; and cross-context elicitation in multi-dimensional settings, and its relationship with the methods and results from Psychology. Joint paper with Larbi Alaoui.