• Graduate Programs
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Summer School
    • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
    • Deep Learning
    • Development Economics
    • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
    • Economics of Climate Change
    • The Economics of Crime
    • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
    • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
    • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
    • Marketing Research with Purpose
    • Markets with Frictions
    • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Tuition Fees and Payment
  • Alumni
Home | Events Archive | Portfolio Constraints as Cross-Model Shrinkage: How Inefficient is the 1/M Covariance Combination?
Seminar

Portfolio Constraints as Cross-Model Shrinkage: How Inefficient is the 1/M Covariance Combination?


  • Location
    Erasmus University Rotterdam, Campus Woudestein, ET-14
    Rotterdam
  • Date and time

    May 28, 2026
    12:00 - 13:00

Abstract

Jagannathan and Ma (2003) show that portfolio constraints act as implicit shrinkage on the covariance matrix and help improve out-of-sample performance. We show in this paper that portfolio constraints produce a second regularization effect: they shrink the cross-section of competing covariance estimators. Once weight restrictions are imposed, the mapping from covariance to portfolio becomes increasingly insensitive to the particular choice. As a consequence, covariance combinations that are central in the cloud of competing estimators perform close to the best individual one, without requiring the practitioner to identify it ex-ante. We confirm this mechanism empirically using daily U.S. equity data from 1980 to 2022, implementing ten covariance estimators and five combination strategies in minimum variance portfolios of up to 1,000 assets