• Graduate Programs
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Summer School
    • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
    • Deep Learning
    • Development Economics
    • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
    • Economics of Climate Change
    • The Economics of Crime
    • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
    • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
    • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
    • Marketing Research with Purpose
    • Markets with Frictions
    • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Tuition Fees and Payment
  • Alumni
Home | Events | Designing Simpler Mechanisms: Transparency and As-If Dominance
Seminar

Designing Simpler Mechanisms: Transparency and As-If Dominance


  • Series
  • Speaker(s)
    Lea Nagel (Harvard University, United States)
  • Field
    Behavioral Economics
  • Location
    Tinbergen Institute, Campus Roeterseiland, E5.22
    Amsterdam
  • Date and time

    September 10, 2026
    12:00 - 13:00

Abstract
We show agents can adopt a simplifying heuristic to avoid dominated strategies. It prescribes playing strategies optimal against all unconditional behaviors of the others. A mechanism is as-if dominant strategy if the adoption of this heuristic is self-supporting. That is, no agent can ever profit by unilaterally strategizing further. As-if dominance is more permissive than dominance, allowing for substantially more transparent mechanisms. This is useful, as we show transparency makes the heuristic’s prescriptions easier to follow. Our approach rationalizes the auction choice of prominent online platforms, such as eBay. Further, it provides a unified explanation for a range of experimental findings. Finally, under some conditions met in our applications, as-if dominance ensures that coarse rationality emerges from a generational learning process. Joint paper with Roberto Saitto.