• Graduate Programs
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Alumni
Home | Events | Shareholder Voting: Hiding the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Seminar

Shareholder Voting: Hiding the Good, the Bad and the Ugly


  • Location
    University of Amsterdam, Roeterseiland campus, A3.01
    Amsterdam
  • Date and time

    September 22, 2026
    13:00 - 14:15

Practicalities

Abstract

Shareholder voting is considered a pivotal feature of corporate governance. It has been analysed from many different angles and perspectives. Yet corporate governance studies have not yet systematically explored how different shareholder classes, including retail shareholders and other non-institutional investors engage in voting. I remedy this deficiency, making three principal contributions. First, I hand-collected how over 70.000 shareholders voted more than 550.000 times their voting shares for more than 220 agenda items of 30 general meetings of three major Italian companies, members of the principal MIB index from 2017 to 2026 and unveil which shareholder classes participate in AGMs and with which voting stakes. Second, I reveal how voting results hide or wipe out divergent signals of a large majority of the shareholders. Third, I analyse when and how different shareholder classes vote for or against board proposals and support or disapprove of the strategic decision takings of the company. The result casts new light on the debate of the division of powers between the board and the shareholders as well as of the adequacy of the commonly used shareholder voting mechanism.