• Graduate Education
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Alumni
Home | Events | How Students Use AI: Evidence from an AI Tutor at University
Seminar

How Students Use AI: Evidence from an AI Tutor at University


  • Series
  • Speaker(s)
    Henning Hermes (University of Munich, Germany)
  • Field
    Empirical Microeconomics
  • Location
    Tinbergen Institute, Roeterseiland campus, E1.17
    Amsterdam
  • Date and time

    November 24, 2026
    16:00 - 17:00

Abstract

We study the extent, nature, and malleability of students' AI use at a German distance-learning university. We link more than 100,000 conversations with a GPT-based tutor chatbot to administrative records for more than 7,000 students, and run a preregistered randomized encouragement campaign. Baseline adoption is selective, concentrated among students with prior AI experience and higher digital competence. Supervised text classification shows that most requests concern concept explanations or task solving, while higher-order uses similar to cognitive activation are rare — a pattern closer to cognitive substitution than to complementarity in skill formation. The degree of cognitive delegation varies widely across students but is highly persistent within them. The campaign raises adoption among newly enrolled students, with no detectable effect among incumbents. Preliminary findings on downstream outcomes indicate higher study progress among new enrollees and lower dropout among incumbents, with no effects on grades. Joint paper with Philipp Höllermann, Ingo Isphording & Sebastian Riedmiller.