• Graduate program
    • Why Tinbergen Institute?
    • Research Master
    • Admissions
    • Course Registration
    • Facilities
    • PhD Vacancies
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Research Master Business Data Science
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Summer School
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Gender in Society
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 16th Tinbergen Institute Annual Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Alumni
Home | News | Award Winning Paper by Rei Sayag and Pedro Robalo
News | April 16, 2013

Award Winning Paper by Rei Sayag and Pedro Robalo

The Unicredit and Universities Foundation awarded TI PhD students Rei Sayag and Pedro Robalo the first prize for their outstanding joint paper entitled “Paying is Believing: The Effect of Costly Information on Bayesian Updating.”

Sayag and Robalo won the Best Paper Award Labor Economics competition and a prize of € 2.000. Their award winning paper examines the assumption that people find it difficult to use new information well in uncertainty-ridden environments. Sayag and Robalo used a laboratory experiment to examine whether making information costly can affect decision making under risk. Their results show that people rely on information they are charged for more than on identical information they obtain for free. In the parlance of Bayesian updating, signals that are costly receive a higher weight that signals that are costless. These results suggest straightforward policy implications for information pricing: if decision makers are not using new information to the amount prescribed by the (Bayesian) normative benchmark, charging for new information will tend to correct this shortcoming. Please click here to read their full paper. Pedro Robalo will present this paper at the workshop on the same topic to be held at IZA, Bonn on June 17-18, 2013.