• Graduate program
    • Why Tinbergen Institute?
    • Research Master
    • Admissions
    • Course Registration
    • Facilities
    • PhD Vacancies
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Research Master Business Data Science
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Gender in Society
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 16th Tinbergen Institute Annual Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Alumni
Home | News | Publication by Sweder van Wijnbergen in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
News | May 18, 2015

Publication by Sweder van Wijnbergen in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

The Journal of Environmental Economics and Management published the paper ‘Optimal learning on climate change: Why climate skeptics should reduce emissions’ authored by TI fellow Sweder van Wijnbergen and TI alumnus Tim Willems (University of Oxford, United Kingdom). The Opt learning GHG_JEEM (2) article is the published version of TI Discussion Paper 12-085/2.

Abstract

Climate skeptics typically argue that the possibility that global warming is exogenous, implies that we should not take additional action towards reducing emissions until we know what drives warming. This paper however shows that even climate skeptics have an incentive to reduce emissions: such a directional change generates information on the causes of global warming. Since the optimal policy depends upon these causes, they are valuable to know. Although increasing emissions would also generate information, that option is inferior due its irreversibility. We show that optimality can even imply that climate skeptics should actually argue for lower emissions than believers.

Citation: Sweder van Wijnbergen, Tim Willems, Optimal learning on climate change: Why climate skeptics should reduce emissions, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 70 (March 2015), 17–33.