• Graduate program
    • Why Tinbergen Institute?
    • Research Master
    • Admissions
    • Course Registration
    • Facilities
    • PhD Vacancies
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Research Master Business Data Science
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Gender in Society
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 16th Tinbergen Institute Annual Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Alumni
Home | News | An article in The Wall Street Journal refers to paper by TI fellows
News | June 22, 2018

An article in The Wall Street Journal refers to paper by TI fellows

The article ‘The Stock-Market Price Can Be Wrong. Very Wrong. Researchers have caught investors in the act of wildly–and unnecessarily–overpaying for a stock’ in The Wall Street Journal by Jason Zweig refers to paper ‘Can the Market Divide and Multiply? A Case of 807 Percent Mispricing in Absence of Arbitrage Risk by fellows Martijn van den Assem (VU Amsterdam), Dennie van Dolder (VU Amsterdam), Remco Zwinkels (VU Amsterdam), and co-author Marc Schauten.  The article appeared in WSJ online edition on June 15, 2018. The paper is available on SSRN.

This paper documents a strong violation of the law of one price surrounding a large-size rights issue. If prices are right, the relation between the prices of shares and rights follows the outcome of a simple calculation. In the case of Royal Imtech N.V. prices deviated sharply from the theoretical prediction. Throughout the term of the rights, investors were buying shares at prices that were up to nine times what they should have been given the price of the rights. The most likely explanation for the sizeable and persistent mispricing is the limited availability of shares for short selling.

Keywords: law of one price, market efficiency, mispricing, limits of arbitrage, rights issue