Baillon, A., Bleichrodt, H., Li, C. and Wakker, PeterP. (2021). Belief hedges: Measuring ambiguity for all events and all models Journal of Economic Theory, 198:.
Chen Li
University
Erasmus University Rotterdam
E-mail
Research field
Behavioral Economics
Interests
Experimental Economics, Intertemporal Choice, Learning, Risk and Uncertainty
Website
Key publications
List of publications
Baillon, A., Halevy, Y. and Li, C. (2022). Experimental elicitation of ambiguity attitude using the random incentive system Experimental Economics, :.
Bleichrodt, H., Eichberger, J., Grant, S., Kelsey, D. and Li, C. (2021). Testing dynamic consistency and consequentialism under ambiguity European Economic Review, 134:.
Baillon, A., Bleichrodt, H., Li, C. and Wakker, PeterP. (2021). Belief hedges: Measuring ambiguity for all events and all models Journal of Economic Theory, 198:.
Li, C., Turmunkh, U. and Wakker, P.P. (2020). Social and Strategic Ambiguity versus Betrayal Aversion Games and Economic Behavior, 123:272--287.
Li, C. and Liu, N. (2020). What to tell? Wise communication and wise crowd Theory and Decision, :.
Bleichrodt, H., Doctor, J., Gao, Y., Li, C., Meeker, D. and Wakker, P. (2020). Resolving Rabin{\textquoteright}s Paradox Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 59(3):239--260.
Bleichrodt, H., Doctor, J.N., Gao, Yu, Li, C., Meeker, D. and Wakker, P.P. (2019). Resolving Rabin’s Paradox Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, in press:.
Li, C., Turmunkh, U. and Wakker, P.P. (2019). Trust as a Decision under Ambiguity Experimental Economics, 22:51--75.
Li, C. (2017). Are the Poor Worse at Dealing with Ambiguity Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 54(3):239--268.
Bleichrodt, H., Li, C., Moscati, I. and Wakker, P.P. (2016). Nash Was a First to Axiomatize Expected Utility Theory and Decision, 81:309--312.
Wakker, P.P., Li, C. and Li, Z. (2014). If Nudge Cannot Be Applied: A Litmus Test of the Readers’ Stance on Paternalism Theory and Decision, 76(3):297--315.
Wakker, P., Li, C. and Li, Z. (2014). If Nudge Cannot Be Applied: A Litmus Test of the Readers{\textquoteright} Stance on Paternalism Theory and Decision, 76(3):297--315.