• Graduate Programs
    • Tinbergen Institute Research Master in Economics
      • Why Tinbergen Institute?
      • Research Master
      • Admissions
      • Course Registration
      • Facilities
      • PhD Vacancies
      • Selected PhD Placements
    • Research Master Business Data Science
    • PhD Vacancies
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Gender in Society
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 16th Tinbergen Institute Annual Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Alumni
    • PhD Theses
    • Master Theses
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Key alumni publications
    • Alumni Community

de Groot, H.L.F. and Nahuis, R. (2002). Optimal product variety and economic growth: the trade-off between internal and external economies of scale Journal of Economics, 76(1):1--32.


  • Journal
    Journal of Economics

We develop a model to analyze the social optimality of growth and product variety. The model contains two sectors, one assembly sector producing a homogeneous consumption good, and one intermediate goods sector producing differentiated inputs. Both growth which results from R & D performed in the intermediate goods sector and the variety of differentiated intermediate goods are determined endogenously. We disentangle three effects of changes in variety: (i) a productivity effect, (ii) a business stealing effect, and (iii) a growth effect. The market provides too little variety and sub-optimally high growth if the productivity effect of variety is large relative to the market power of intermediate goods producers. If varieties are not very productive, the market provides a too low rate of growth, whereas variety may either be too low as well as too high. Decentralization of both the first-best and a second-best is considered. The model is calibrated to US data to assess the magnitude of required policy interventions and the degree of sub-optimality of growth and product variety. We show that in this framework growth in the market can indeed be sub-optimally high for plausible parameter values.