• Graduate Programs
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Summer School
    • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
    • Deep Learning
    • Development Economics
    • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
    • Economics of Climate Change
    • The Economics of Crime
    • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
    • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
    • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
    • Marketing Research with Purpose
    • Markets with Frictions
    • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Tuition Fees and Payment
  • Alumni

Barendse, S., Kole, E. and van Dijk, D. (2023). Backtesting Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall in the Presence of Estimation Error Journal of Financial Econometrics, 21(2):528--568.


  • Journal
    Journal of Financial Econometrics

We investigate the effect of estimation error on backtests of expected shortfall (ES) forecasts. These backtests are based on first-order conditions of a recently introduced family of jointly consistent loss functions for value-at-risk (VaR) and ES. For both single and multiperiod horizons, we provide explicit expressions for the additional terms in the asymptotic covariance matrix that result from estimation error, and propose robust tests that account for it. Monte Carlo experiments show that the tests that ignore these terms suffer from size distortions, which are more pronounced for higher ratios of out-of-sample to in-sample observations. Robust versions of the backtests perform well with power against common alternatives. We also introduce a novel standardization of the conditional joint test statistic that removes the need to estimate higher-order moments and significantly improves its performance. In an application to VaR and ES forecasts for daily FTSE 100 index returns as generated by (GJR-)GARCH and HEAVY models, we find that estimation error substantially impacts the outcome of the backtests, and is not bound to particular subperiods such as the credit crisis.