• Graduate program
    • Why Tinbergen Institute?
    • Research Master
    • Admissions
    • Course Registration
    • Facilities
    • PhD Vacancies
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Research Master Business Data Science
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Gender in Society
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 16th Tinbergen Institute Annual Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Alumni

van Wijnbergen, S. and Estache, A. (1999). Evaluating the Minimum Asset Tax on Corporations: an Otion Pricing Approach Journal of Public Economics, 71(1):75--96.


  • Journal
    Journal of Public Economics

King-Fullerton methodology cannot assess the minimum-asset tax because it cannot handle uncertainty. We present an alternative based on option pricing, and show how carryover rules, depreciation conventions, and uncertainty affect the MAT burden. Using Brazilian data, we show (A) because of the high intersectoral variance of returns on capital, the MAT does not reduce sectoral distortions; (B) while high variance raises the MAT burden, high risk firms are not hit harder by the MAT: high-risk firms also have a high rate of return, which reduces the impact of the MAT.