• Graduate Programs
    • Tinbergen Institute Research Master in Economics
      • Why Tinbergen Institute?
      • Research Master
      • Admissions
      • Course Registration
      • Facilities
      • PhD Vacancies
      • Selected PhD Placements
    • Research Master Business Data Science
    • PhD Vacancies
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Gender in Society
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 16th Tinbergen Institute Annual Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Alumni
    • PhD Theses
    • Master Theses
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Key alumni publications
    • Alumni Community

Overmeer, J., Corbett, C. and Salomon, M. (1997). Intractable problems in discussing OR practice at a scientific conference: Reflections on a panel discussion at EURO XIV European Journal of Operational Research, 99(1):197--206.


  • Affiliated author
    Marc Salomon
  • Publication year
    1997
  • Journal
    European Journal of Operational Research

Panel sessions on OR practice are a common event at conferences, but they often do not seem to lead to productive discussions or to generate new ideas. In this paper we identify reasons why this happens, based on our experiences with a semi-plenary panel session on the challenges of practicing OR, organized during the EURO XIV Conference in Jerusalem in July 1995 by the last two authors. Despite the initiators' efforts to the contrary, this session left those polled at the end with a sense of hopelessness about such discussions.We analyze the session using a taxonomy of the 15 issues addressed, almost all of which have been raised (many times) before. Together they form a complex collection of interdependent issues, which can be boiled down to some long-standing dilemmas in the field of OR. We believe that much of the disappointment voiced about the session stems from its remaining at the level of individual issues and failing to address the underlying dilemmas. We trace the design strategies of the organizers (a provocative question, a large and participating audience, a wide variety of views within the panel and a limited time frame) as key factors in creating conditions leading to a rather non-linear discussion, based much more on advocacy than on inquiry and which took place on a high level of abstraction. Finally, we generate some proposals for how to create a more effective interpenetration of the worlds of academics and practitioners, in particular in the context of future conferences.