• Graduate Programs
    • Tinbergen Institute Research Master in Economics
      • Why Tinbergen Institute?
      • Research Master
      • Admissions
      • Course Registration
      • PhD Vacancies
      • Selected PhD Placements
    • Facilities
    • Browse our Courses
    • Research Master Business Data Science
    • PhD Vacancies
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Gender in Society
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 16th Tinbergen Institute Annual Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Job Market Candidates
  • Alumni
    • PhD Theses
    • Master Theses
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Key alumni publications
    • Alumni Community

Franses, P.H. and Kleibergen, F. (1996). Unit roots in the Nelson-Plosser data: Do they matter for forecasting? International Journal of Forecasting, 12(2):283--288.


  • Journal
    International Journal of Forecasting

In this paper we compare two univariate time series models, i.e. one with and one without an imposed unit root, in a forecasting experiment for the fourteen annually observed US data analyzed by Nelson and Plosser (1982, Journal of Monetary Economics 10, 139-162). Our main result is that the unit root model is regularly preferred. This result holds for a variety of sample sizes and forecast horizons as well as for one-step and multi-step ahead forecasts.