• Graduate Programs
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Summer School
    • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
    • Deep Learning
    • Development Economics
    • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
    • Economics of Climate Change
    • The Economics of Crime
    • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
    • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
    • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
    • Marketing Research with Purpose
    • Markets with Frictions
    • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Tuition Fees and Payment
  • Alumni

Oishi, T., van der Laan, G. and van den Brink, R. (2023). Axiomatic analysis of liability problems with rooted-tree networks in tort law Economic Theory, 75(1):229--258.


  • Journal
    Economic Theory

We analyze a legal situation in which a plaintiff suffers the total damage of the cumulative injury that is caused by multiple sequences of tortfeasors{\textquoteright} wrongful acts. This liability situation is modeled by a tuple consisting of a rooted-tree network of causation of the injury, and a list of marginal damages. The problem is to determine how to share the total damage among the tortfeasors in such situations. A rule is a mapping that associates with each liability problem a list of payments to be made by the tortfeasors to pay for the plaintiff{\textquoteright}s harm. We axiomatize two rules that are obtained as the Nucleolus and the Shapley value, respectively, of a coalitional game with tortfeasors as players. The axioms involved in these axiomatizations are derived from the legal concept of tort law.