• Graduate Programs
    • Tinbergen Institute Research Master in Economics
      • Why Tinbergen Institute?
      • Research Master
      • Admissions
      • Course Registration
      • PhD Vacancies
      • Selected PhD Placements
    • Facilities
    • Browse our Courses
    • Research Master Business Data Science
    • PhD Vacancies
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Gender in Society
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 16th Tinbergen Institute Annual Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Job Market Candidates
  • Alumni
    • PhD Theses
    • Master Theses
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Key alumni publications
    • Alumni Community

Gerritsen, A. (2025). Income tax evasion and third-party reported consumption and wealth: implications for the optimal tax structure The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 127(1):115--148.


  • Journal
    The Scandinavian Journal of Economics

Tax authorities increasingly make use of third-party reported consumption expenditures when appraising individual income reports. They may initiate an audit if consumption reports cannot be justified by self-reported income. This in turn incentivizes tax evaders to avoid third-party reported consumption goods. I determine the implications of this for the optimal tax structure. A tax on non-reported goods discourages tax evasion because these goods are disproportionately consumed by tax evaders. A tax on reported goods also discourages tax evasion because it further distorts the evader's consumption bundle. I show that it is desirable to tax third-party reported goods at a higher (lower) rate than non-reported goods if the elasticity of substitution between both goods is smaller (larger) than one. I then apply the same logic to third-party reported wealth – i.e., future consumption goods – which tax authorities also use in their audit policies. Existing evidence on the intertemporal elasticity of substitution suggests that it may be optimal to tax third-party reported wealth at a positive rate.