• Graduate Programs
    • Tinbergen Institute Research Master in Economics
      • Why Tinbergen Institute?
      • Research Master
      • Admissions
      • Course Registration
      • Facilities
      • PhD Vacancies
      • Selected PhD Placements
    • Research Master Business Data Science
    • PhD Vacancies
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Gender in Society
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 16th Tinbergen Institute Annual Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Alumni
    • PhD Theses
    • Master Theses
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Key alumni publications
    • Alumni Community

Boehl, G. and Hommes, C. (2025). Rational vs. irrational beliefs in a complex world Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 232:.


  • Journal
    Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

How do rational and boundedly rational agents interact in a competitive asset market? To answer this question, we build a highly nonlinear asset pricing model where agents hold heterogeneous beliefs. Our model features fully rational forward looking agents versus boundedly rational backward looking agents whose market shares evolve endogenously. This gives rise to chaotic model dynamics which are characterized by complex bubble and crash dynamics, even without any exogenous fluctuations. We show that computational methods can be applied to numerically analyze models combining agents forming rational expectations and agents forming extrapolative expectations, with the possibility of transition between one type of behavior and the other. Not only do we find that boundedly rational agents remain in the market, but document that their effect on price dynamics is even amplified by the behavior of fully rational agents. In their interaction, trend-extrapolators amplify small deviations from fundamentals, while rational agents eventually anticipate market crashes after large bubbles and drive prices back to the fundamental.