• Graduate Programs
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Summer School
    • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
    • Deep Learning
    • Development Economics
    • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
    • Economics of Climate Change
    • The Economics of Crime
    • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
    • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
    • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
    • Marketing Research with Purpose
    • Markets with Frictions
    • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Tuition Fees and Payment
  • Alumni

Heilmann, C. and Szymanowska, M. (2026). The Ethics of FIRE Journal of Business Ethics, 205(4):829--844.


  • Journal
    Journal of Business Ethics

FIRE stands for {\textquoteleft}Financial Independence, Retire Early{\textquoteright}. Those who adopt the FIRE lifestyle aim at achieving financial independence as early as possible in their lives. They do so by focusing on earning and saving in their younger years, so as to accumulate enough financial wealth that allows them to retire early. We argue that FIRE has what we term {\textquoteleft}deliberative value{\textquoteright}. FIRE is a tool that can help individuals think about the bottom-line consequences of their cares and concerns. We argue that unlocking the deliberative value of FIRE crucially depends on individuals reflecting about the value concepts that motivate their FIRE lifestyle choice. Adopted without reflection, FIRE can be dangerous. And yet, {\textquoteleft}the examined FIRE may be worth starting{\textquoteright}, because it can be a tool for the effective pursuit of one{\textquoteright}s adopted deliberative values. To illustrate this, we provide a comprehensive survey of relevant approaches from philosophy and economics that pertain to scheduling preferences, time discounting, intertemporal rationality, life-planning, freedom, the value of work, broader notions of the good, and individualism, amongst others. We suggest that empirical work is needed to investigate the social effects of FIRE. We also suggest that philosophers invested in specific debates about value concepts would do well to integrate FIRE into the set of examples they theorize about, as it can serve as an instructive case study.