• Graduate Programs
    • Facilities
    • Tinbergen Institute Research Master in Economics
      • Why Tinbergen Institute?
      • Research Master
      • Admissions
      • PhD Vacancies
      • Selected PhD Placements
    • Research Master Business Data Science
    • Education for external participants
    • Summer School
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • PhD Vacancies
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Summer School
  • Alumni
    • PhD Theses
    • Master Theses
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Key alumni publications
    • Alumni Community
Home | Events Archive | Political Debate on Social Media: Theory and Evidence
Seminar

Political Debate on Social Media: Theory and Evidence

  • Series
    CREED Seminars
  • Speaker(s)
    Ole Jann (CERGE-EI and Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic)
  • Field
    Behavioral Economics
  • Location
    University of Amsterdam, Roeterseilandcampus, E5.22
    Amsterdam
  • Date and time

    October 24, 2024
    16:00 - 17:15

Abstract: We investigate online political debate with a theoretical model and an original, large-scale dataset. In our model, debaters can use several types of strategic communication but also derive "expressive utility" from speaking their mind. We examine how social media users try to convince others and "win" debates by deploying arguments, hyperlinks, media and different styles of language. Our empirical analysis considers almost 140,000 Twitter interactions between users whose ideological stance we can estimate, using a novel methodology. We use our model to interpret this data and document patterns that are consistent with the predictions of the model.