• Graduate program
    • Why Tinbergen Institute?
    • Research Master
    • Admissions
    • Course Registration
    • Facilities
    • PhD Vacancies
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Research Master Business Data Science
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Gender in Society
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 16th Tinbergen Institute Annual Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Alumni
Home | Events | Private Firms: Friends or Foes of Public Firms?
Seminar

Private Firms: Friends or Foes of Public Firms?


  • Location
    Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam, room 1.01
    Amsterdam
  • Date and time

    September 24, 2025
    12:45 - 14:00

Abstract
We examine the impact of positive private firm innovation shocks and private firm liquidity shocks on existing public firm peers using an extensive dynamic textual network of roughly a half million public and private product market peers from 2000 to 2021. We document that state-level shocks to the incentives of private firms to invest in R&D have positive effects on related public firms consistent with product market complementarities. After these innovation shocks to private peers, related public firms increase acquisitions of private firms and have improved profitability, sales growth, competitive positioning, and investments including R&D. In contrast, state-level liquidity shocks, which instead relax financing constraints of private firms located in these states, negatively impact related public firms, consistent with substitution and private firms increasing competitive pressure on public firms. These results indicate a new empirical framework and novel indications of where private firms are either complements or substitutes to larger public firms. Joint paper with Gordon M. Phillips.