• Graduate Programs
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Alumni
Home | Events Archive | Harsh Rhetoric and Cultural Identity: Backlash Effects of Denmark’s Ghetto List
Seminar

Harsh Rhetoric and Cultural Identity: Backlash Effects of Denmark’s Ghetto List


  • Series
  • Speaker(s)
    Linea Hasager (University of Copenhagen, Denmark)
  • Field
    Empirical Microeconomics
  • Location
    Tinbergen Institute, Roeterseiland campus, E5.22
    Amsterdam
  • Date and time

    April 07, 2026
    16:00 - 17:00

Abstract

We study how the cultural identity of non-Western residents responds to the official labeling of their neighborhoods as "Ghettos" and accompanying political rhetoric emphasizing cultural difference. Using a Regression Discontinuity design, we find that non-Western residents in listed neighborhoods become more likely to give their children foreign-sounding names. This shift was accompanied by lower enrollment in early childcare, more traditional gender attitudes, stronger self-identification as an immigrant or member of a religious group, and lower propensity to follow Danish news. Socioeconomic integration was unaffected, and residential composition did not change, suggesting that the policy's stigmatizing nature and public discourse catalyzed the observed cultural backlash.