• Graduate program
    • Why Tinbergen Institute?
    • Research Master
    • Admissions
    • Course Registration
    • Facilities
    • PhD Vacancies
    • Selected PhD Placements
    • Research Master Business Data Science
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Gender in Society
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 16th Tinbergen Institute Annual Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Alumni
Home | News | Paper by fellows Aurélien Baillon and Chen Li accepted for publication in Econometrica
News | November 25, 2021

Paper by fellows Aurélien Baillon and Chen Li accepted for publication in Econometrica

Aurélien Baillon, who works as a Professor at Erasmus School of Economics, and Chen Li, who works a an Assistant Professor at Erasmus School of Economics, wrote their paper in collaboration with co-author Professor Yoram Halevy (University of Toronto).

Paper by fellows Aurélien Baillon and Chen Li accepted for publication in Econometrica

Econometrica is a renowned academic journal in several areas of economics, with a specific focus on econometrics. It is published by Wiley-Blackwell.

The paper by Baillon, Li and Halevy, entitled Randomize at your own Risk: on the Observability of Ambiguity Aversion, deals with the way in which decision making is influenced by our perception of risks, risks that are often ambiguous. Many people dislike this ambiguity, a dislike defined as ambiguity aversion. The authors suggest that the prevalence of ambiguity aversion may very well have been underestimated.