• Graduate Programs
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Summer School
      • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
      • Deep Learning
      • Development Economics
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Economics of Climate Change
      • The Economics of Crime
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
      • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Markets with Frictions
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Business Data Science Summer School Program
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • 2026 Tinbergen Institute Opening Conference
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference
  • News
  • Summer School
    • Applied Public Policy Evaluation
    • Deep Learning
    • Development Economics
    • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
    • Economics of Climate Change
    • The Economics of Crime
    • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
    • From Preference to Choice: The Economic Theory of Decision-Making
    • Inequalities in Health and Healthcare
    • Marketing Research with Purpose
    • Markets with Frictions
    • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
    • Sustainable Finance
    • Tuition Fees and Payment
  • Alumni

Gudmundsson, J., Hougaard, J.L. and Ansink, E. (2026). Shifting the reference point in environmental regulation: From polluter-pays to beneficiaries-compensate The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, :1--30.


  • Journal
    The Scandinavian Journal of Economics

In many environmental problems, emissions are hard to monitor and abatement costs are privately known. We study how efficient abatement nevertheless can be induced through market-like arrangements that condition transfers on verifiable abatement rather than on measured emissions. We characterize the transfer schemes that implement efficient abatement in unique dominant strategies and show that a single scheme, the beneficiaries-compensate transfer scheme, emerges under two distinct characterizations: one based on equilibrium properties and one grounded in classical fairness axioms. Under the beneficiaries-compensate transfer scheme, each agent compensates others according to the benefits received from their abatement. We illustrate its usefulness in two applications.